2005 Acura RSX - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2005 Acura RSX 2-DR. w/SAB has received excellent front crash driver side and passenger side ratings of 5 out of 5, and a solid side crash driver side rating of 4 out of 5. Unfortunately, the overall safety rating is not available for this vehicle. It does not come equipped with electronic stability control, forward collision warning, or lane departure warning systems.

In terms of complaints and recalls, there have been 32 complaints reported and 2 recalls issued for this vehicle. It is important for drivers to stay informed about these complaints and recalls to ensure the safety and reliability of their Acura RSX. Considering the strong front crash ratings but the lack of certain advanced safety features, potential buyers may want to consider additional safety options or precautions for this model.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

32

Recall Count

2

Investigation Count

0

Safety Rating

Not Rated

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2005 Acura RSX 2-DR. w/SAB Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2005 Acura RSX 2-DR. w/SAB

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

No
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2005 Acura RSX 2-DR. w/SAB Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2005 Acura RSX 2-DR. w/SAB Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2005 Score 2006 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Driver Side Rating 5 5
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating 5 5

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2005 Score 2006 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating 4 4
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2005 Score 2006 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated Not Rated
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated

Complaints for the 2005 Acura RSX

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"i bought an 05' rsx and have had nothing but problems. the car sounds like a rattling cab, has a terrible suspension and makes a clunking noise that the dealership has been unable to fix since i got the car almost a year ago. they have been nothing but rude and condescending, and are obviously not capable of selling a car that is functional, nor fixing it correctly. i wish i never bought it. *jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2006-01-02

Complaint:
"loud clunking noise coming from right front of vehicle. possibly struts. sounds happen at slow speeds, i.e. parking lots, backing up. *nm"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2007-02-12

Complaint:
"i purchased my rsx type-s in july 2005, after approx. 1000 miles it began making a loud popping noise when turning the steering wheel at low speeds. after 2000 miles it continued to get louder so i took it in for service. the service writer claimed it was normal noise, they greased some bushings and he told me that if i returned they would be unable to do anything for me. it's odd, why didn't my car make this noise when i purchased it, and if it is normal, why wasn't it making it during the test drive? *jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2005-10-10

Complaint:
"front suspension safety defects. new 2005 acura rsx required front strut assembly replacements due to clunking noise when turning at slow speeds. strut assemblies both on back order, taking three (3) weeks for repairs. american honda motors co., inc., originally claimed that "the fix" for the problem, ("not a safety issue") was to apply a "special lubricant" coming from japan, as determined by "our engineers." ten (10) days later, honda says that the "special lubricant" was not "the fix" but that "shaving down the lower springs was "the fix." within an hour, american honda motors co., inc., by its legal team, claimed that "shaving down" the springs was "not entirely accurate" for the current fix, but rather they would "tweak" the suspension. no further description of this "tweaking" was provided. finally, after deciding not to repurchase the car with defective strut assemblies, honda claims that its engineers have determined that the struts were bent in shipping. the current "fix" is to bend the strut in the opposite direction, i.e., away from the spring, and that all will be well. no consideration was given to any metallurgical defects from bending the steel in opposite direction, nor on any other part of the suspension system as a result of this "tweaking." the identical suspension defects have been reported to this website as early as april 6, 2005, and to various acura dealers in the washington metropolitan area. a single dealer replaced struts on four (4) 2005 rsx cars. moreover, honda has known about the defect at least since mid-july, 2005, if not before, yet refuses to replace the car or to definitively determine the precise problem and a uniform and proper correction since the replacement struts have the same defect as those installed originally. indeed, honda admits that all 2005 rsx base model cars have the problem because a new strut supplier has been providing the struts and springs than has done so previously. *jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2005-10-06

Complaint:
"when turning left at slow speeds (15-25 mph) i hear a clicking/clunking noise coming from the front left of the car. i just purchased the car 2006 rsx and will be taking in tomorrow to see if they can fix it. although i have read that many have had this problem with no fix. *jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2007-04-08

Complaint:
"the front right wheel started making a banging noise going over some bumps with a brand new automobile. i took it to the dealer and they denied anything was wrong. again, this is a brand new car with less than 500 miles on it. it started occurring with 100 miles on it.*jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2005-05-08

Complaint:
"the front right wheel started making a banging noise going over some bumps with a brand new automobile. i took it to the dealer and they denied anything was wrong. again, this is a brand new car with less than 500 miles on it. it started occurring with 100 miles on it. this report is for a acura rsx automobile. there is no selection for the acura rsx automobile on this website (next page). *jb correct vehicle added 9/8/2005, duplicate odi report also exists. *dsy"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2005-05-08

Complaint:
"the rear of the vehicle pulls to the side when using the brakes on the freeway. when i had my mechanic check it, he found that the right rear wheel had excessive toe-in and corrected it. this is with a with a brand new automobile. i took it to the dealer for other problems also and they denied anything was wrong. again, this is a brand new car with less than 500 miles on it. it started occurring with 100 miles on it. this report is for a acura rsx automobile. there is no selection for the acura rsx automobile on this website (next page). *jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2005-05-08

Complaint:
"acura rsx type-s model, 1,500 miles old. turning wheel at slow speed hearing popping/clunking/clicking noise in front, very highly possibly the front suspension/strut/spring being defective. possibly high speed as well but probably can't hear it. *jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2006-12-07

Complaint:
"acura rsx type-s model, 1,500 miles old. turning wheel at slow speed hearing popping/clunking/clicking noise in front, very highly possibly the front suspension/strut/spring being defective. possibly high speed as well but probably can't hear it.*jb"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2006-12-07

Recalls for the 2005 Acura RSX

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"certain tradesonic combination lamps sold as replacement lamps for use on the above listed passenger vehicles. combination lamps not equipped with amber side reflectors fail to conform with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment."
Consequence:
LACK OF AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS IN THE LAMPS WILL DECREASE LIGHTING VISIBILITY TO OTHER DRIVERS AND MAY POSSIBLY RESULT IN A VEHICLE CRASH.
Remedy:

TRADESONIC WILL NOTIFY OWNERS AND REPLACE THE LAMPS FREE OF CHARGE. THE RECALL IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN DURING JULY 2006. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TRADESONIC AT 626-934-8884.

Component(s) Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2006-07-17

ACURA Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

ACURA ranks 25 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other ACURA vehicles?

2017 RLX
ACURA
  • Overall Safety Rating: 5
  • Complaints Count: 1
  • Recall Count: 0
View Car
2024 ZDX
ACURA
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 0
  • Recall Count: 0
View Car
2022 ILX
ACURA
  • Overall Safety Rating: 5
  • Complaints Count: 2
  • Recall Count: 0
View Car
2012 RL
ACURA
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 1
  • Recall Count: 6
View Car