2013 Buick REGAL - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2013 Buick Regal has an impressive overall safety rating of 5, which indicates excellent safety features and crash test performance. This car also comes equipped with electronic stability control, which enhances stability and helps prevent skidding or loss of control. However, it does not have forward collision warning or lane departure warning systems, which could be helpful in avoiding potential accidents.

In terms of complaints and recalls, the Regal has had 86 complaints reported and 5 recalls issued. While the number of complaints may be a concern, the fact that the manufacturer has responded with recalls shows a commitment to addressing any safety issues promptly. Overall, the Buick Regal offers a high level of safety for drivers and passengers alike.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

86

Recall Count

5

Investigation Count

2

Safety Rating

5/5

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2013 Buick Regal 4 DR FWD Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2013 Buick Regal 4 DR FWD

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

Standard
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2013 Buick Regal 4 DR FWD Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2013 Buick Regal 4 DR FWD Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2011 Score 2013 Score 2020 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated 4 Not Rated
Front Crash Driver Side Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated 4 Not Rated

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2011 Score 2013 Score 2020 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2011 Score 2013 Score 2020 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated 4 Not Rated
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result No Tip
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated

Complaints for the 2013 Buick REGAL

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"the contact owns a 2013 buick regal. the contact stated that the front driver's side headlight was replaced by the dealer six years ago. the contact stated that the front passenger's side front headlight was inoperable and replaced three years ago; however, the contact stated that the front driver's and passenger's side headlights have since become inoperable due to heavy condensation. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the vehicle was diagnosed with failed front driver's and passenger's headlights due to condensation. the contact was informed that the driver's and passenger's side headlights needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the failure mileage was approximately 42,000."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2024-06-12

Complaint:
"both headlights have condensation and are not working."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2022-06-05

Complaint:
"condensation in drivers headlight caused headlight malfunction. i have seen multiple posts regarding this issue that have not been addressed. serious safety issue. no warning lights or indicators tell you light has malfunctioned either."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2022-09-04

Complaint:
"driver side headlight assembly amasses ounces of water / condensation causing bulb and ballast failures - i've removed the assembly twice to replace the ballast and bulbs costing $100.00 per attempt only to have to replace them again within a week. passenger side is dry and crystal clear - absolutely a defective part and it costs over a $1,400.00 a side. driving with a single headlight is illegal and dangerous. gm is well aware of the problem and refuses to address it."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2020-01-06

Complaint:
"my drivers side hid headlight assembly developed condensation inside the assembly causing a headlight failure. though the car is a 2013, it had only 64000 miles on it when the condition occurred. this is obviously a manufacturing defect since there has been no impact to the headlight assembly and no visible break in the seal."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2022-01-08

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2013 buick regal. the contact stated that his headlamp housings constantly filled up with condensation causing the bulbs to fail prematurely. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the ballasts and bulbs were replaced and the headlamp housings resealed. mcguire buick gmc (1625 us-46, little falls, nj 07424 (973)200-6699) was contacted and the contact was informed that the warranty was expired. the contact was provided an estimate of $3,000 to replace the headlamps. the manufacturer was not notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 30,000."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2021-02-05

Complaint:
"the driver's side headlight has an issue with the seal (no visible cracks or damage to the light) which allows water/condensation to accumulate in the headlight. this ends up blowing the bulbs and fuse. even after replacing the bulb and the fuse, the light still will not work. after replacing the fuse, the daytime running lights no longer work and there is apparently an electrical issue with the wiring harness that causes a short in the lighting (see attached video). i was driving at night when my driver's side headlight completely stopped working. there is no indication to alert the driver when this happens. i only knew because it happened at night and drastically decreased my visibility (rural area with no street lights). this is obviously a huge safety issue. i've contacted buick and was told that there is no recall and that it's not covered due to my vehicle being outside of the warranty. the entire headlight assembly needs to be replaced and is approximately $1,500 to replace (not to mention the $100 bulb that i had just replaced that blew out). after researching this matter, it appears that there are multiple complaints for the 2013 year model with hid lights. this seems to be a common problem and there should be a recall for this. this vehicle fails to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 108, "lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment." something needs to be done about this!!! the manufacturer will not correct this issue if you are outside of the warranty unless they are forced to by a recall. *tr"
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2020-01-05

Complaint:
"the hid lighting burned through the plastic case allowing the strategically placed ballast on the bottom to fill with water and the light bulb failed to ignite. a major safety issue while driving"
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2021-08-02

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2013 buick regal. the contact stated that the driver side head light failed to operate without warning. the contact notice that moisture had accumulated inside of the driver's side headlamp assembly. the contact also noticed that the headlamp circuit board was corroded due to the condensation. the manufacturer was contacted and a claim number was provided. the vehicle was taken to penske buick gmc of cerritos located at (18400 studebaker rd, cerritos, ca 90703). the contact was then notified by the dealer that the repair was not free and would have to be paid for out of pocket. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was approximately 30,000."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2019-01-11

Complaint:
"driver's headlight quit working. took it to dealer, they said it was the headlight. wasn 't the headlight. said it was the ballast. worked for 2 minutes. they said that ticket was closed and charged me $650. they said next step was a headlight assembly. have been trying to order one and it is no longer available. $1600 from dealer. light had accumulated considerable moisture prior to the hid assembly failing. when the ballast was replaced the light failed again before i arrived home 3 miles away."
Components Involved: EXTERIOR LIGHTING
Date of incident: 2020-03-01

Recalls for the 2013 Buick REGAL

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"general motors, llc (gm) is recalling certain 2012-2013 buick regal, 2013 chevrolet malibu, and 2010-2013 buick lacrosse vehicles sold or ever registered in connecticut, delaware, the district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, virginia, west virginia, or wisconsin. these vehicles may have rear toe links that received excessive electrocoating (e-coat) corrosion protection, which could cause the e-coat to become brittle and break away when contacted by road debris. over time, the e-coat may chip away, exposing the metal toe link and making it more susceptible to corrosion. corrosion may eventually cause the toe link to thin and ultimately to fracture."
Consequence:
A rear toe link fracture may reduce the driver's ability to control the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

GM will notify owners, and dealers will replace the rear suspension toe links and adjuster fasteners free of charge. Parts are not currently available. Owners were mailed an interim notification on January 27, 2021, and April 15, 2021. A third notification was mailed on August 19, 201. Owners may contact Buick customer service at 1-800-521-7300 or Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020. GM's number for this recall is N202308930.

Component(s) Involved: SUSPENSION > REAR
Date of incident: 2020-12-10

Recall:
"general motors, llc (gm) is recalling certain 2013 buick regal, chevrolet malibu, and buick lacrosse vehicles sold or ever registered in connecticut, delaware, the district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, virginia, west virginia, or wisconsin. these vehicles may have rear toe links that received excessive electrocoating (e-coat) corrosion protection, which could cause the e-coat to become brittle and break away when contacted by road debris. over time, the e-coat may chip away, exposing the metal toe link and making it more susceptible to corrosion. corrosion may eventually cause the toe link to thin and ultimately fracture."
Consequence:
A rear toe link fracture may reduce the driver's ability to control the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

Dealers will replace the rear suspension toe links and adjuster fasteners, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters were mailed on September 30, 2021. Owner notification letters were mailed on January 3, 2022. Owners may contact Buick customer service at 1-800-521-7300 or Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020. GM's number for this recall is N212330130.

Component(s) Involved: SUSPENSION > REAR
Date of incident: 2021-08-12

Recall:
"general motors, llc (gm) is recalling certain 2010-2013 buick lacrosse, 2012-2013 buick regal, and 2013 chevrolet malibu vehicles sold or ever registered in connecticut, delaware, the district of columbia, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, virginia, west virginia, or wisconsin. these vehicles may have rear toe links that received an improper amount of electrocoating (e-coat) corrosion protection, which could cause the e-coat to become brittle and break away when contacted by road debris. over time, the e-coat may chip away, exposing the metal toe link and making it more susceptible to corrosion. corrosion may eventually cause the toe link to thin and ultimately fracture."
Consequence:
A rear toe link fracture may reduce the driver's ability to control the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

Dealers will replace the rear suspension toe links and adjuster fasteners, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed January 27, 2022. Owners may contact Buick customer service at 1-800-521-7300 or Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020. GM's number for this recall is N212346640. This recall is an expansion of NHTSA recalls 20V-764 and 21V-633.

Component(s) Involved: SUSPENSION > REAR
Date of incident: 2021-12-22

BUICK Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

BUICK ranks 20 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other BUICK vehicles?

2008 ENCLAVE
BUICK
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 529
  • Recall Count: 6
View Car
2024 ENCORE GX
BUICK
  • Overall Safety Rating: 5
  • Complaints Count: 1
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2005 RAINIER
BUICK
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 103
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2005 LACROSSE
BUICK
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 313
  • Recall Count: 5
View Car