2017 Chevrolet SILVERADO 3500 - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 PU/CC RWD does not have an overall safety rating available. However, it does come equipped with standard electronic stability control, which is a positive feature for enhancing vehicle stability during challenging driving conditions. Unfortunately, this vehicle does not have forward collision warning or lane departure warning systems, which could potentially help prevent accidents.

It is important to note that there have been 136 complaints reported for this vehicle and 6 recalls issued. While the safety features like stability control are beneficial, potential buyers should consider the reported complaints and recalls when assessing the overall safety and reliability of the 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 3500.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

136

Recall Count

6

Investigation Count

0

Safety Rating

Not Rated

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2017 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 PU/CC RWD Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 PU/CC RWD

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

Standard
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2017 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 PU/CC RWD Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 PU/CC RWD Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2009 Score 2017 Score 2019 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Driver Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2009 Score 2017 Score 2019 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2009 Score 2017 Score 2019 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Complaints for the 2017 Chevrolet SILVERADO 3500

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"the contact owns a 2017 chevrolet silverado. the contact stated that the vehicle was previously repaired under nhtsa campaign number: 19v761000 (service brakes, hydraulics, service brakes, electronic stability control). the contact stated that while driving at 55 mph, the brake pedal was depressed; however, the vehicle failed to reduce speed and stop immediately, which caused the contact to rear-end another vehicle. the contact sustained injuries and received medical attention. a police report was filed. the vehicle was towed to a tow shop. the vehicle has not been deemed totaled. the vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired by an independent mechanic or dealer. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the failure mileage was approximately 50,000."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2024-01-03

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2017 chevrolet silverado. the contact stated that while driving at various speeds, an abnormal clunking sound was heard coming from the vehicle. the contact also stated that the oil level was always low. there was no warning. the vehicle was taken to the midway chevrolet located at (2323 w bell rd, phoenix, az 85023) where the technician repaired the vehicle under nhtsa campaign number: 19v645000 (service brakes, hydraulic), the failure recurred. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and told the contact to take the vehicle back to the dealer. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure mileage was approximately 3,000."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2017-01-08

Complaint:
"my 2017 chevy 2500hd silverado shakes hard when the brakes are applied."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2019-10-12

Complaint:
"while coming to a stop in turn lane, brake assist light came on. intermittent issue. after couple days of experiencing, i take truck in to find out about recall. they perform reprogramming. doesn't fix issue. tell me i have to pay diagnostic fee. thy find vacuum pump needs replacing. they covered cost under "special coverage" because they know it's faulty (but not covered already under recall?). they say it's fixed. i pick the truck up, brake assist light comes on driving out the parking lot. take it back next day. they tell me "pin" in the connector is broken causing "ground fault." they charge me $500+ to run new wire in wire harness. same connector that would have to be touched while replacing vacuum pump. i pay to have pin fixed. 3 weeks later, brake assist light comes back on with same exact symptoms. this time, they tell me ecbm need to be replaced. not just reprogrammed. somehow, the prior times, the error code wasn't stored. a) errors aren't being stored b) they're covering their warranty cost by charging for other adjacent parts c) brake assist issue going on for nearly 8 weeks now unresolved. they need to expand their recall to include adjacent "connectors" which the dealer admits hardly ever fail. also should include vacuum pump not just as special coverage. also, recall should expand to replace ecbm because apparently they aren't storing fault codes when they occur. i read this same thing across many forum posts online. all the same issues. hard braking, or soft mechanical brake feel. i've now spent 1100 dollars on a problem that falls squarely within the description of the recall. they tell me that "these parts" aren't covered under the recall. i say, expand the recall. recall states they don't have to include this in sec filings. i think they are under representing their true costs. my gm case #9-5696419690"
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2020-11-12

Complaint:
"trailer brake control module light illuminated in the dash. this may cause the vehicle to be inoperable unexpectedly. this part may be associated with a reprogramming issue that was on another recall. customer is burdened with repair costs and the module is in high demand as part of a 'national recall'. i have been waiting 6 weeks for the back ordered part. i was told it was delayed as result of a labor strike."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2020-01-01

Complaint:
"brakes squeaked and tight and not functioning right"
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2019-08-08

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2017 chevrolet silverado. the contact stated that while traveling at 70 mph, the brakes failed to operate. the contact was able to stop the vehicle with his emergency brake and pulled the vehicle off to the side of the road. the contact took the vehicle to bob stall chevrolet (7601 alvarado rd, la mesa, ca 91942) to have the vehicle serviced under nhtsa campaign number: 19v645000 (service brakes, hydraulic);however, the dealer did not have the parts to service the vehicle. the vehicle remained in their possession for 6 weeks. the contact requested a loaner vehicle which was denied. the manufacturer had been notified of matter and have offered no assistance. the vehicle had not been repaired. the failure mileage was approximately 41,000."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2019-06-12

Complaint:
"my 2017 silverado is experiencing a very hard brake pedal at slow speeds. i took it into the dealership in october 2019 for the recall pertaining to this issue where they reprogram the braking unit. i had taken it in for that recall just as a preventative measure but now 4 months later i have a very hard brake pedal at slow speeds. i had not had a braking issue until now. when it acts up the pedal is so hard it makes it difficult to stop the truck. it seems to have a hard brake pedal when i'm going slow as in bumper to bumper traffic or parking the vehicle in a parking lot while applying the brakes off and on while doing so."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2020-11-01

Complaint:
"had recall performed to address hard breaking at slow speeds. now the truck is harder to stop at slow speeds and gm will not fix the problem. they know it's the vacuum pump and booster and expect me to pay for it."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2021-07-12

Complaint:
"recalled at dealership for brake software adjustment. after recall brake peddal periodiaclly in hot weather compresses co.pletly to floor and makes loud squeeking sound. truck is hard to stop when this happens. vehicle ws in slow moving approach to parking lot."
Components Involved: SERVICE BRAKES
Date of incident: 2020-12-10

Recalls for the 2017 Chevrolet SILVERADO 3500

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"general motors (gm) is recalling certain 2017-2018 chevrolet silverado 2500 and 3500 and gmc sierra 2500 and 3500 trucks. the front seat belt retractor assemblies were built with the incorrect torsion bar. as such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard number 209, "seat belt assemblies.""
Consequence:
The seat belt retractors may not perform as intended during a crash, increasing the risk of injury.
Remedy:

GM will notify owners, and dealers will replace both front seat belt retractor assemblies, free of charge. The recall began March 24, 2021. Owners may contact GMC customer service at 1-888-988-7267 or Chevrolet customer service at 1-800-222-1020. GM's numbers for this recall are 17368, 17375, and 17376.

Component(s) Involved: SEAT BELTS > FRONT > RETRACTOR
Date of incident: 2017-09-14

CHEVROLET Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

CHEVROLET ranks 2 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other CHEVROLET vehicles?

2016 CAMARO
CHEVROLET
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 119
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2012 CORVETTE ZR1
CHEVROLET
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 50
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2015 CORVETTE
CHEVROLET
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 59
  • Recall Count: 5
View Car
2005 MALIBU
CHEVROLET
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 1377
  • Recall Count: 7
View Car