2007 Ford FIVE HUNDRED - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2007 Ford Five Hundred has received high ratings in various crash scenarios, with a 5-star rating for both the front and side crashes for both drivers and passengers. Additionally, it has a rollover rating of 4, indicating good stability in the event of a rollover. However, it does not have electronic stability control, forward collision warning, or lane departure warning systems which could enhance its safety features.

In terms of complaints and recalls, the vehicle has a significant number of complaints, with 199 reported. Additionally, there have been 2 recalls issued for this model. While the crash ratings are reassuring, the lack of advanced safety features and the number of complaints and recalls may be areas of concern for potential buyers.

auto generated summary, may be inaccurate.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

199

Recall Count

2

Investigation Count

1

Safety Rating

Not Rated

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2007 Ford Five Hundred 4-DR. Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2007 Ford Five Hundred 4-DR.

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

No
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2007 Ford Five Hundred 4-DR. Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2007 Ford Five Hundred 4-DR. Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2005 Score 2007 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Driver Side Rating 5 5
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating 5 5

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2005 Score 2007 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating 5 5
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating 5 5
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2005 Score 2007 Score
Rollover Rating 4 4
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result No Tip No Tip
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated

Complaints for the 2007 Ford FIVE HUNDRED

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"periodically but occuring more often. once the car is placed in drive or reverse but foot still on the brake, once the brake is released the car quickly and aggressively accelerates on it's own without pressing the gas pedal and with very little reaction time you have to slam the brake pedal to make the car stop and then the car cuts off. this has happened at least 4 times within the last month. very dangerous! i have researched recall information for this model as well as my direct vin number associated with my vehicle but i have yet to find a recall. however i have read many reviews of the same issues with other ford 500 owners."
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2019-01-06
Complaint:
"while backing up car surged and caused rear bumper damage. throttle body cleaned twice since purchase and surge issue reappears. surge occurs at low rpm's. *tr"
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2011-10-06
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact stated that the vehicle would lose acceleration while driving a various speed. the wrench warning icon would illuminate when the failure occurred. the vehicle was taken to the dealer numerous times for the failure. the dealer cleaned the throttle body however, the failure was not corrected. the vehicle was taken back to the dealer for further inspection. the dealer advised that the throttle body needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 50,000 and the current mileage was 80,000."
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2012-01-01
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact received a customer satisfaction letter for the cleaning of the throttle body and took the vehicle to the dealer for the repair. the contact stated that the cleaning, the throttle failed. the vehicle was taken back to the dealer, who advised that the throttle body needed to be replaced. the failure mileage was 128,000 and the current mileage was 130,000. *tr"
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2015-03-05
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact stated that while stopped with the brake pedal depressed, the engine revved. additionally, while driving approximately 5 mph, the vehicle accelerated independently. the vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was found that the throttle would have to be cleaned. the vehicle was repaired but the failure recurred. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. the approximate failure mileage was 85,000. *tr"
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2013-05-03
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact stated that while shifting from neutral to drive, the vehicle accelerated independently and crashed into a pole. the vehicle was towed to the dealer for diagnosis but the contact was not given a diagnosis as to why the failure occurred. the manufacturer was notified and stated that they would investigate the cause of the crash. the vehicle was repaired. the failure and current mileage was 93,840. updated 4/24/13 *cn updated 06/04/2013*js"
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2013-09-01
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact stated that while in reverse the vehicle lunged backward and crashed into a mailbox. the failure recurred constantly when the vehicle was placed in drive or reverse. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who diagnose that there was a failure with the tps sensor within the throttle body. the vehicle was not repaired. the approximate failure mileage was 25,000."
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2008-11-10
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact was driving approximately 10 mph when the brake pedal was engaged and the vehicle suddenly lunged forward. the failure recurred intermittently on separate occasions. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the throttle body was cleaned. the manufacturer was not notified of the problem. the approximate failure mileage was 70,000. the consumer stated the incident occurred while stopped. the incident has yet to recur since the throttle body was cleaned. the dealer was made aware of the problem. 08/30/2012 *js"
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2011-06-07
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact stated that while stopped at a stop light, the vehicle attempted to surge forward. the contact then attempted to accelerate, but the vehicle hesitated and stalled. in addition, the vehicle would attempt to surge forward while driving even thought the accelerator pedal was not depressed. the vehicle also attempted to surge backward on occasions. the failure recurred consistently. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that the failure was caused by a power surge. the vehicle was not taken to have the failure diagnosed or repaired. the vin was unavailable. the approximate failure and current mileages were 125,782."
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2014-01-06
Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2007 ford five hundred. the contact stated that upon starting, the vehicle jerked and accelerated on its own. the vehicle was taken to the dealer for a diagnosis. the dealer stated that the throttle body needed to be replaced. the vehicle was repaired. the manufacturer was not contacted. the failure and current mileages were 67,000."
Components Involved: VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Date of incident: 2012-03-07

Recalls for the 2007 Ford FIVE HUNDRED

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"ford is recalling certain model year 2007 ford five hundred and mercury montego vehicles manufactured from september 5, 2006, through september 11, 2006. the fuel tanks may not have consistent welds between the fuel tank and fuel filler neck spud which can affect the strength of the joint. some fuel tank spud welds may not provide the expected strength in the event of a severe rear impact to the vehicle. an improper weld can result in a crack in the joint which could illuminate the emissions malfunction indicator light, cause a fuel odor, or allow fuel to leak out."
Consequence:
FUEL LEAKAGE, IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IGNITION SOURCE, COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
Remedy:

DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE FUEL TANK FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON AUGUST 16, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER AT 1-866-436-7332.

Component(s) Involved: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE > STORAGE > TANK ASSEMBLY > FILLER PIPE AND CAP
Date of incident: 2011-07-13

FORD Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

FORD ranks 1 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other FORD vehicles?

2013 F-250 SUPERCAB
FORD
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 107
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2010 TRANSIT CONNECT WAGON
FORD
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 40
  • Recall Count: 2
View Car
2022 F-150 REGULAR CAB
FORD
  • Overall Safety Rating: 5
  • Complaints Count: 354
  • Recall Count: 12
View Car
2008 F-250
FORD
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 322
  • Recall Count: 11
View Car