2006 Nissan 350Z - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2006 Nissan 350Z has not been rated for overall safety by the NHTSA. However, in terms of specific crash ratings, the car received a 5-star rating for the driver's side in side crash tests and a 5-star rating for rollover protection. It is worth noting that the car is equipped with optional electronic stability control but does not have forward collision warning or lane departure warning systems.

In regards to safety concerns, there have been 52 complaints and 1 recall reported for the 2006 Nissan 350Z. It is important for owners to stay informed about any safety-related issues and ensure that necessary maintenance and repairs are conducted to address potential concerns.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

52

Recall Count

1

Investigation Count

2

Safety Rating

Not Rated

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2006 Nissan 350Z 2-DR. Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2006 Nissan 350Z 2-DR.

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

Optional
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2006 Nissan 350Z 2-DR. Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2006 Nissan 350Z 2-DR. Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2005 Score 2006 Score 2008 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Driver Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated 4
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated 4

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2005 Score 2006 Score 2008 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating 5 5 5
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2005 Score 2006 Score 2008 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Complaints for the 2006 Nissan 350Z

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"on friday july 5th 2013 just after getting off the expressway i heard a noise coming from the front of the car. just as i pulled into the driveway my wheel (rim) broke off. wow, thank the good lord i wasn't on the freeway. the wheel hub was still attached to the bolts, and the rim broke, upon further inspection the other front wheel has cracks on all five spokes. the vehicle is unsafe to drive, had it towed to the local nissan dealership in oceanside, california. why has there been no recalls. it seems there are numerous reports of the same problem. still awaiting a response from mossy nissan in oceanside, ca. *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2013-05-07

Complaint:
"while driving to visit my grandsons on christmas eve, the rear drive wheel broke. the wheel broke from the car and travel down the highway at a high rate of speed. luckily i was able to slow the car down and get it to the side of the road. i could only sit helpless as i watch the broken wheel bounce down the highway. the wheel came to a stop more than 400 yards. a quote from the chp officer, "it never happens this way. usually the wheel lands on someone else's car causing a accident." this is the second wheel that has broke on my car. summer 2011 i had to replace a cracked wheel when getting new tires. the remaining two wheels on the car have been looked at and cracks have been found. since my insurance will not cover the cost of new wheels, i'm forced to replace them myself. while doing some investigative work, i have found more than a dozen cases just like mine. the tire shop i visited today said they have had 3 other nissan 350z - 2006 with the same problem. how many cases have not been reported? nissan will not take responsibility and recall their bad batch of wheels from 2006. what does it take to make nissan responsible and recall these wheels? *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2013-12-12

Complaint:
"tl - the contact owns a 2006 nissan 350z. the contact stated that the front passenger side wheel rim developed a cracked, which caused the wheel to loose air pressure. the vehicle was taken to the dealer who verified the failure and stated to the contact that the failure was caused by a manufacturing defect. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure who offered to cover fifty percent of the repair costs. the vehicle was not repaired. the failure and the current mileage was 75,000. kmj"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2012-05-12

Complaint:
"heard some squeaking from front left tire. i inspected the chrome wheel and found all 5 spokes had cracks in them all the way through. i had the vehicle inspected and found all 4 chrome wheels had cracks and was advised to park vehicle as it was not safe to drive. i contacted the service manager at my dealership and he advised that the rims on my vehicle were sent out to be chromed by someone else other than nissan causing nissan not to be responsible for these cracked rims. this vehicle, a touring roadster 350z was bought new from a nissan dealership with these chrome rims already on them, this other dealership also happens to be owned by the current dealership i go to. the service manager said the dealership also would not be responsible because they only warranty this for 3years/36,000. my vehicle has less than 19,600 miles on it. *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2011-06-09

Complaint:
"on may 11,2010 i had my car towed to the local nissan dealer on maui. the wheels on our car started to disintegrate and break up causing us to swerve and stop on the road. i was told by the dealer that because the car was out of warranty i would have to purchase new wheels for $5550. the factory rep john hookano, my wife and i met after two weeks of the car sitting at jim faulk nissan with no follow up call. he showed us that the original wheels were aluminum alloy, and not chromed and stated they must be aftermarket or chromed without factory authorization, he then showed us a bulletin issued from nissan 2008, stating their position not to chrome the wheels. we purchased a 2006 350z grand touring special edition which included navigation system, brembo brakes, basically every option including convertible. when i explained i purchased the car new from the dealer in arizona and they did a dealer trade for it. when it arrived from peoria arizona's nissan dealer the chromed wheels were on it. we took delivery at lamb nissan in prescott arizona, as is, we changed nothing. when i showed the factory rep a service repair order from when the warranty was in effect, which made reference to the clicking wheels and that we have continued to have issues with the tire pressure monitor system he ignored my comment. the car has less than 36,000 miles and yes the warranty expired. i did purchase an extended warranty in which i was told does not cover wheels. however i believe if the nhtsa inspector looked into this fault would be found with either the manufacturer or the dealer. i contacted lamb nissan and the general manager ed walsh found the records that indicate i purchased the car with the wheels on it from the original dealer who took delivery of the car, and that it did in fact arrive with chrome nissan wheels. he said i will credit $1000 to a new set. we emailed nissan early on and got a response we will be contacted vanessa fiorello consumer affairs never returns my email. *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2010-11-05

Complaint:
"tl*the contact owns a 2006 nissan 350z. the contact stated that her factory rims were customized and dipped in a chrome substance before they were purchased. while driving 25 mph the chrome rim separated. as consequence her risk of vehicle crash was increased. the manufacturer was notified and she received a replacement set of rims. the dealer stated that they were aware of the failure with this model type. the failure and current mileages were 26,000."
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2010-12-09

Complaint:
"tl*the contact owns a 2006 nissan 350z. while driving approximately 25 mph on normal road conditions making a left turn, there was a loud sound outside of the vehicle. the contact observed that the front end of the vehicle had fallen on the ground and the front passenger wheel disengaged from the vehicle. the vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic. the technician stated the failure was contributed to a defective rim. the vehicle has not been repaired. the contact has concerns of the significant safety hazard. the failure and current mileages were 31,000."
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2010-07-08

Complaint:
"was hearing noise and took car to dealership and was told that i have 4 cracked rims and should buy new ones for 3067.00. i was told that yes the dealership does send there rims to be chromed but of course they said they didn't do mine. i told them i didn't do it. nothing was done to fix the problem, was offered a free tow cause was told car was unsafe to drive. so i am out of pocket almost 1900.00. the service manager at dealership told me if i wasn't willing to pay the 3067.00 dollars for new rims that i should start by looking at the junk yard. i have 2 nissan bulletins reference # ntb92-123a and ntb92-123c which clearly discourages what nissan is doing regarding the chroming of rims. *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2008-11-11

Complaint:
"i have a 2006 nissan 350z convertible. i had the 06 wheels aftermarket powercoated in may 2007. roughly a month later, i found that one of the wheels had cracked. i bought a replacement wheel, had the wheel powercoated to match the other three. roughly 4 months later, i discovered two more wheels had cracked. researching the cause of the cracks led me to the complaints filed earlier on the same wheel being affected by the chroming process. my biggest fear is as we alter the wheels, we are in essence aging the wheel and discovering it to be of substandard quality to begin with. i know of three others who have had atleast one wheel crack after powder coating. 4/9 wheels local to me have cracked and 1/4 in southern california. *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2007-06-06

Complaint:
"i own a 2006 nissan 350z with chrome wheels. three of the wheels are cracked and the car is unsafe to drive. through the process of trying to get nissan to replace the wheels, i learned that the wheels on the car are after-market re-chromed wheels. nissan is not being helpful in getting the problem resolved by replacing the wheels. i am referencing nhtsa defect action number pe06050 and engineering analysis ea07005. *tr"
Components Involved: WHEELS
Date of incident: 2008-05-10

Recalls for the 2006 Nissan 350Z

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"zf service is recall certain clutch kit assemblies, part number sx: k70358-01, shipped to wholesalers as service parts between september 1, 2010, and march 8, 2011. these service parts are intended for use on model year 2003-2006 nissan 350z and infiniti g35 vehicles. the sx: k70358-01 clutch kit contains an oversized clutch disc."
Consequence:
AN OVERSIZED CLUTCH DISC COULD CAUSE THE VEHICLE TO MOVE UNINTENTIONALLY ON THE INITIAL START-UP, IF THE DRIVER DOES NOT FOLLOW THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND FAILS TO USE THE SERVICE BRAKES WHILE THE HAND BRAKE IS NOT APPLIED. UNINTENTIONAL MOVEMENT OF THE VEHICLE COULD RESULT IN A CRASH OR POSSIBLE INJURY TO PERSONS OUTSIDE THE VEHICLE.
Remedy:

ZF SERVICE NOTIFY WHOLESALERS TO RETURN ANY AFFECTED CLUTCH KIT ASSEMBLIES STILL IN INVENTORY FOR FREE REPLACEMENT KITS. THIS CONDITION WILL CORRECT ITSELF AFTER THE FIRST START-UP AND USAGE OF THE CLUTCH KIT. HOWEVER, IF AN OWNER IS NOT SATISFIED WITH ITS PERFORMANCE, ZF SERVICES WILL REIMBURSE THE OWNER FOR THE COST OF THE REPLACEMENT CLUTCH KIT AND A REASONABLE AMOUNT FOR ITS INSTALLATION. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JULY 13, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT ZF SERVICES AT 1-800-321-0784 EXT. 6748.

Component(s) Involved: POWER TRAIN > CLUTCH ASSEMBLY
Date of incident: 2011-06-24

NISSAN Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

NISSAN ranks 5 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other NISSAN vehicles?

2012 ARMADA
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 14
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2008 TITAN
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 128
  • Recall Count: 6
View Car
2010 CUBE CARGO
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 52
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2010 PATHFINDER
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 38
  • Recall Count: 5
View Car