2014 Nissan 370Z ROADSTER - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster C RWD does not have an overall safety rating available as per the data provided. The car does come equipped with standard electronic stability control, which is a positive feature for preventing accidents caused by loss of control. However, it does not have forward collision warning or lane departure warning systems, which could potentially enhance driver safety by providing alerts for potential collisions and lane deviations.

In terms of complaints and recalls, the vehicle has 9 complaints reported, indicating some issues raised by consumers. On the bright side, there are no recalls listed for this model, suggesting that there are no major safety-related defects identified by the manufacturer at the time of data collection. It is essential for prospective buyers to consider both the reported complaints and the lack of recalls in their evaluation of the overall safety and reliability of this particular car.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

9

Recall Count

0

Investigation Count

1

Safety Rating

Not Rated

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster C RWD Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster C RWD

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

Standard
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster C RWD Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2014 Nissan 370Z Roadster C RWD Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2010 Score 2014 Score 2019 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Driver Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2010 Score 2014 Score 2019 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2010 Score 2014 Score 2019 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

Complaints for the 2014 Nissan 370Z ROADSTER

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"my clutch would not come off the floorboard. i could not shift into any gear. this happen 3 different times after i would make long freeway trips without shifting. i had 3 different, well established mechanics look at my and do a diagnostic test. as i waited for a tow truck. i found a lawsuit against nissan for a faulty (concentric) clutch slave cylinder! on 2 of the occasions i would let my car cool down for an hour or so and it would be fine. on this occasion, i let my sit over night. the next day my clutch was still on the floor. i fulled the clutch off the floor with my foot. i turned the car on. the car lunged forward almost going into the hotel building. i pulled the e-break and turned the car off. the car was towed to the nissan dealership in renton wa. i had to explain to the dealer about the lawsuit on the clutch slave cylinder. he had not heard of it. i contacted me later and agreed it was the clutch slave cylinder. i was exiting the freeway 2 times and was not able to shift past 2nd gear the two times before. this last time i was coming off the freeway and had to coast into the nearest drive. i was caught off guard , i rolled through one four way stop with my hazard lights on. so not to get stuck in middle of the road. *tr"
Components Involved: POWER TRAIN
Date of incident: 2021-01-06

Complaint:
"summary: the vehicle concentric slave cylinder (csc), a component of the transmission and clutch, failed abruptly in heavy traffic, leaving the vehicle forced in-gear and unable to shift out of gears or to neutral without damaging the transmission. this is a significant safety risk since it happens abruptly and removes control of the vehicle from the driver; due to the nature of the failure, this can also create a panic-situation similar to brake, steering, or throttle failures since the clutch is an essential part of controlling a manual transmission vehicle in all scenarios. event: while driving in traffic, shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear (at approximately 30 mph) the clutch pedal would not return once the vehicle was in 3rd gear. i had to stall the vehicle intentionally, thus at high speed (approximately 10+mph) and in traffic, the tires of the vehicle locked-up and the car skidded to a stop. this also imparted drivetrain and engine shock due to the large mechanical forces involved. concerns: in almost all typical driving scenarios, this failure can be deadly. if this happens on a two-lane highway this can lead to head-on collisions. if it happens on a freeway that sees an abrupt stop, this can lead to a multi-car collision. if this happens on a road with bends or turns this can result in loss of control such that the vehicle may be off-road or over guardrails. why nhsta involvement is critical: this is a significant safety concern and a common failure mode of cars with this same nissan transmission, and it is caused by negligent design and manufacturing practices by nissan. failed class-action lawsuits put together by small teams of people have not resulted in removing this safety concern from those who haven't seen the failure yet. my vehicle is a well maintained 2014 nissan 370z with less than 20,000 miles on it, for reference."
Components Involved: POWER TRAIN
Date of incident: 2021-05-06

Complaint:
"after driving my 2014 nissan 370z for 40,000 miles, the clutch stuck to the floor. i was at an intersection and finally able to pull the clutch pedal up with my foot. at the next intersection, again the clutch stayed down and again i was able to pull it up to shift gears. upon the third shifting of gears, the clutch stayed on the floor and even lifting it with my foot, i was not able to get it into any gear. had i been in the middle of a highway shifting gears i might not have been able to get to the side of the road therefore i would have definitely been in a hazardous situation for both myself and other drivers."
Components Involved: POWER TRAIN
Date of incident: 2018-06-06

Complaint:
"my csc - clutch slave cylinder gave up on me putting my clutch petal to the floor unable to change any gears. i was stranded on the road for hours. nissan must fix this issue with 370z with manual transmission the csc is made of plastic and should (must) be replaced with one made my metal. many hundreds of 370z enthusiast have this issue."
Components Involved: POWER TRAIN
Date of incident: 2016-10-06

Complaint:
"bought a brand new 2014 nissan 370z back on may 9th 2014. amazing car with one really bad weak link, csc. my csc (clutch slave cylinder) went out at 23,309 miles. luckily i was parked right outside my house. my clutch peddle sank to the floor and would not engage. had to tow the vehicle to my dealership to have them determine it "would not be covered under warranty" due to "misuse of the vehicle" from a "burnt" flywheel. i did some research and hundreds of 370z's with manual transmissions have had the same issue with their csc. there are pages and pages of discussions on forums about this plastic csc. we believe there should be a recall on this and should be covered under warranty since hundreds of consumers have had the same issue and nissan does not want to cover it under the powertrain warranty when in fact is a power train issue on their part.great car, bad csc, bad customer support by nissans consumer affairs. *tr"
Components Involved: POWER TRAIN
Date of incident: 2015-10-03

Complaint:
"this incident occurred at a busy intersection during heavy traffic. manual transmission sunny, air temp approx 75 f. the vehicle had been driven appox 0.25 miles & 2 minutes immediately prior to event and parked for the previous 4 hours. driver partially engaged the clutch and shifted to 1st gear to initiate forward movement of the vehicle from a complete stop. at a speed of approx 10mph the driver fully depressed the clutch pedal (to disengage the clutch) to coast momentarily with traffic and shift to 2nd gear. the driver partially re-engaged the clutch with throttle to resume acceleration with traffic. the clutch pedal failed to return to the fully engaged, default, position during operation; the clutch pedal returned only approximately 1/3 of nominal travel distance. concurrently, the clutch did not engage and slipped with regular throttle applied for the shifting condition. pumping of the clutch pedal did not restore normal clutch pedal position nor normal clutch function. failure of the clutch to properly engage and disengage prevented the driver from fully and safely controlling the vehicle. driver forced transmission to neutral position, indicated to surrounding traffic and coasted to shoulder across multiple lanes. driver noted that no apparent obstruction to the mechanical operation of the clutch pedal within the cabin. driver noted an odor, presumably from overheated clutch or hydraulic fluids. substantially normal clutch pedal and clutch function returned within several minutes. the vehicle was driven several miles and parked for an hour. normal clutch pedal and clutch function were noted after this hour. *tr"
Components Involved: POWER TRAIN
Date of incident: 2015-07-08

NISSAN Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

NISSAN ranks 5 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other NISSAN vehicles?

2018 NV1500
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 2
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2019 LEAF PLUS
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 46
  • Recall Count: 3
View Car
2012 NV1500
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 3
  • Recall Count: 4
View Car
2005 PATHFINDER
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 1047
  • Recall Count: 4
View Car