2010 Toyota RAV4 - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

Based on the safety rating data of the 2010 Toyota RAV4, the overall safety rating is marked as "Not Rated." However, the vehicle received high ratings in specific crash tests with a 5-star rating for the front crash driver's side and both side crash tests, indicating good protection in these scenarios. The RAV4 also scored a 4-star rating in the front crash passenger side and rollover tests.

In terms of safety features, the Toyota RAV4 comes equipped with standard electronic stability control, which is an important safety feature that helps prevent loss of control in certain driving situations.

While the vehicle does not have forward collision warning or lane departure warning systems, it still offers a decent level of safety with its stability control system.

It is worth noting that there have been 391 complaints reported for this specific model, along with 14 recalls. These numbers indicate that there have been some issues reported by owners and that there have been necessary recall campaigns to address potential safety concerns.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

391

Recall Count

14

Investigation Count

1

Safety Rating

Not Rated

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2010 Toyota RAV4 4-DR. w/SAB Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2010 Toyota RAV4 4-DR. w/SAB

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

Standard
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2010 Toyota RAV4 4-DR. w/SAB Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2010 Toyota RAV4 4-DR. w/SAB Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2005 Score 2010 Score 2024 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated 4
Front Crash Driver Side Rating 4 5 4
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating 4 4 5

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2005 Score 2010 Score 2024 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated 5
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating 5 5 5
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating 5 5 5
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated Not Rated 5
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated Not Rated 5
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated Not Rated 5

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2005 Score 2010 Score 2024 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated 4 4
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result No Tip No Tip
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated Not Rated 5

Complaints for the 2010 Toyota RAV4

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"regarding nhtsa campaign: 13v383000 for 2006-2011 toyota rav4 the accepted repair procedure for the above referenced nhtsa campaign is flawed. on my vehicle, the effect of permanently disabling the rear toe adjustment has greatly increased maintenance and operating costs and has potentially degraded the safety of all vehicles of this type. i have experienced greatly accelerated wear of the rubber suspension components and tires resulting in the requirement of a complete rear suspension rebuild. my concern is that other vehicles of this type that are not maintained to standards due to cost, or have had the recall reversed to mitigate the financial impact, as i have done, are operating in a potentially dangerous condition. in effect this campaign has created a cost barrier to proper maintenance of critical safety systems. i have spoken with toyota corporate, and they have no interest in investigating, revisiting or offering other solutions to this issue as the recall repair procedure was quote "approved by the government"."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2018-05-07

Complaint:
"2010 toyota rav4. consumer writes in regard to warranty enhancement program and feels the company and dealership should cover warranty work. *as *js"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2019-01-08

Complaint:
"rear suspension fix of previous recall will not allow rear alignment of vehicle because of the epoxy encasement. this is not acceptable. just spent 800.00 on tires and alignment only to find out the rear is out of alignment and can't be aligned due to toyota's fix (epoxy encasement)."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2020-07-10

Complaint:
"we took our toyota rav4 to principle toyota for the suspension recall on 10/16/2019. upon a tire inspection today (at a local tire store) it was indicated to us that principle toyota did not install the appropriate arms on the car. i am attaching a copy of the service record (which shows what appears to be the correct replacement parts) but that is not what was installed on our vehicle. i feel that this was done in retaliation because upon arriving for my pre-scheduled service appointment principal toyota staff said they did not have the parts or "special tool" to handle the recall. i am attaching an email i sent to principle toyota expressing my disgust on how the "recall" was being handled. along with the email is the parts "supposedly" put on my vehicle. i am attaching documentation supporting our story."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2017-07-10

Complaint:
"installed rear lower suspension arms (non-adjustable rear toes) in 2014 per recall campaign #16v596000. tire vendor said rear alignment was off in 2016 (when replacing new tires) and could not be adjusted or replaced with adjustable toe due to recall sticker. dealer inspected toes 2016 and said specs are right and tire vendor does not have right specs. since 2016 i have replaced 4 tires twice within 50,000 miles even though tires have longer 50,000 mile warranties. the tires have lasted less than half of their expected lifetime. in 2019, tire vendor said rear alignment is off again when replacing tires and can't be adjusted due to recall sticker. this suggests that the rear toes inserted in 2014 for safety recall created a new problem - poor alignment which causes premature wearing of tires. i'm requesting permission to replace non-adjustable rear toes with adjustable ones so that i don't have to keep prematurely replacing my tires."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2020-04-07

Complaint:
"sometimes when i am pulling out or pulling in to park my car i hear this bang on my right rear side. sometimes when i am turning left or right and the right rear tire gets most of the weight of the vehicle i hear the same hard bang. i took it to my mechanic and he rode with me and he heard it too. my mechanic thought it was the struts and replaced them, but that was not the problem. i still have this problem. please help. my mechanic said that under the car in the rear there is a bar that has a stamp that indicates recall item."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2019-01-02

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. the contact stated that the vehicle was serviced per nhtsa campaign number: 16v596000 (suspension). the mechanic found that the vehicle was not affected by this recall, but it was repaired anyway at toyota of portland (55 ne broadway st, portland, or 97232, (503) 284-1105). at no cost. toyota?s prescribed recall repair involves applying an epoxy to the adjustment nuts on the rear lower suspension arms (toyota part # 4871042020), per the instructions specified by toyota (safety recall ?csj?). in december 2018, a tire service center noted the contact?s rear wheels where out of alignment but that they could not perform an alignment due to the application of the epoxy ? which seized the adjustment nuts in place. the contact is now unable to have a rear alignment performed. contact returned the vehicle to the dealer, who stated that the suspension arms must be entirely replaced in order to realign the rear wheels ? with toyota insisting the recall work (applying epoxy) is performed again at contact?s expense. contact was quoted $1050 by toyota dealership to perform the work. prior to the recall, a rear alignment could be performed at the same dealership (or any independent mechanic) ? utilizing the adjustment nuts ? for approximately $85. in summary, the contact believes toyota?s prescribed recall repair has introduced a safety issue due to removing the ability to have independent mechanic perform a rear alignment.*dt *jb *tr"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2017-12-12

Complaint:
"toyota issued a safety recall g0v a few years ago that sealed the rear suspension arms with an epoxy. my rear alignment is out, and i cannot no longer adjust my rear suspension unless i replaced both rear suspension arms. toyota says this is my own problem, and any repair associated with this safety recall has to come from my pocket. how can the safety recall lead to another problem? i am probably not the only one who has experienced this issue as i read several other folks who voiced their concerns online. is there anything that nhtsa can do?"
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2019-11-10

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. the contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic for a wheel alignment. when the mechanic placed the vehicle on the lift, it was noticed that the rear passenger side control arm was bolted and epoxied. the contact stated that the rear passenger side control arm was repaired on december 21, 2014 by toyota of morristown (169 ridgedale avenue, morristown, nj 07960) per nhtsa campaign number: 16v383000 (suspension). immediately after the repairs were performed, the rear passenger tire started to wear unevenly and had to be replaced five times. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failures. the approximate failure mileage was 100,000."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2020-03-04

Complaint:
"rear toe allinemennt adjusters recall. the part is now being epoxied due to a toyota manufacturing flaw. now the customers have to suffer the cost at $600.00 to have a simple allinement done on the rear of the car. the online car reviews from other customers are really pissed for being played suckers from toyota. there is a lot of loyal toyota customers going to drop toyota and go with honda. and after getting rid of these flawed cars to the open market and other people get to own flawed junk 'toyota's', their view will be the same as the current toyota owners. then the snowball effect kicks in plus all the news about toyota's now being junk cars i'm sure will hurt the company where it should, in their bank accounts. i was a big loyal toyota owner for years, taking a lot of heat from my nascar friends for owning a toyota, wait till they hear about this, this will make their day and a i told you so will be next. toyota has or had a chance to do it right and they are blowing it big time. 2006-2011 years have been recalled on the rav4, over 200,000 cars. at this number toyota will go down quick. i also have been through 2 sets of expensive tires due to this problem to find out it's a shoddy way for toyota to do business like this. we, the customer have been played off as stupid, i don't see it that way along with a lot of others. i hear honda's are still doing it right, if something don't happen soon, i will be finding it out myself. oh i almost forgot, the tires now going bad way to soon is a safety issue and now very hard to afford the cost of operation for this vehicle, you think it's the shocks, they check good, shame on you toyota."
Components Involved: SUSPENSION
Date of incident: 2018-11-07

Recalls for the 2010 Toyota RAV4

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"toyota motor engineering & manufacturing (toyota) is recalling certain model year 2006-2011 toyota rav4 vehicles manufactured october 31, 2005, to september 7, 2010, and 2010 lexus hs250h vehicles manufactured july 6, 2009, to august 26, 2010. the affected vehicles have rear suspension arms (rear tie rods) with adjusting lock nuts that may have been improperly tightened after servicing. as a result of being loose, the arm may have thread damage and may rust, possibly leading to the failure of the arm and an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment."
Consequence:
Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

Toyota will notify owners and dealers will replace both rear suspension arms and encapsulate the locknuts, free of charge. The recall began on September 30, 2016. Owners may contact Toyota customer service at 1-800-331-4331. Toyota's numbers for this recall are G0V for Toyota vehicles and GLK for Lexus vehicles. Note: This recall supersedes recall 13V-383, in which some vehicles were only inspected, sealed, and did not have both arms replaced. The affected vehicles were previously recalled under 13V-383, but did not have both rear suspension arms replaced at that time. Those vehicles need to have both arms replaced as part of this recall remedy.

Component(s) Involved: SUSPENSION > REAR
Date of incident: 2016-08-12

Recall:
"toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 rav4 and 2010 lexus hs250h passenger vehicles manufactured from october 2005 through september 2010. if the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tie rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust, leading to thread damage and eventual failure. failure of the rear tie rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment."
Consequence:
Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the rear tie-rod nut for looseness and replace any suspect tie-rod found loose. Dealers will also affix instructions in multiple places to prevent improper servicing in the future. The recall began on November 30, 2012. Owners may contact Toyota at 1-800-331-4331 or Lexus at 1-800-255-3987.

Component(s) Involved: SUSPENSION > REAR
Date of incident: 2012-08-02

Recall:
"toyota is recalling certain model year 2006 through 2011 rav4 and 2010 lexus hs250h passenger vehicles manufactured from october 2005 through september 2010. if the nuts for adjusting the rear wheel alignment are improperly tightened during service, the rear suspension arm (rear tie rod) may develop unwanted movement and rust leading to thread damage and eventual failure. failure of the rear tie rod will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment."
Consequence:
Failure of the rear tie rod could cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

Toyota will notify owners, and dealers will inspect the tie rods and replace any that have rust or corrosion on the alignment adjustment threads. All of the rear tie rods will then be encased in an epoxy to prevent future environmental damage. Due to limitations in parts, the recall remedy will be launched in phases from September 2013 through mid-April 2014. All owners will receive notification of the recall, with most receiving second notifications when parts are available in their area. IMPORTANT: This recall supersedes Toyota and Lexus recall 12V-373. All vehicles that have been inspected and remedied under the previous recall need to be re-inspected and have the appropriate remedy applied.

Component(s) Involved: SUSPENSION > REAR
Date of incident: 2013-08-28

TOYOTA Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

TOYOTA ranks 3 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other TOYOTA vehicles?

2019 YARIS
TOYOTA
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 24
  • Recall Count: 3
View Car
2017 4RUNNER
TOYOTA
  • Overall Safety Rating: 4
  • Complaints Count: 29
  • Recall Count: 5
View Car
2007 LANDCRUISER
TOYOTA
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 3
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2016 AVALON HYBRID
TOYOTA
  • Overall Safety Rating: 5
  • Complaints Count: 23
  • Recall Count: 4
View Car