2013 Nissan JUKE - Ratings, Complaints and Recalls

The 2013 Nissan Juke SUV AWD has an overall safety rating of 4 out of 5. It scored a 3 in overall front crash rating, a 5 in overall side crash rating, and a 4 in rollover rating. The vehicle is equipped with standard electronic stability control, which enhances its safety features. Unfortunately, it does not have forward collision warning or lane departure warning systems. Additionally, there have been 90 complaints reported for this model and it has been subject to 2 recalls. Overall, while the Nissan Juke has solid safety ratings and stability control, the lack of collision and lane departure warnings may be areas of concern for some consumers. It's important for car owners to stay informed about recalls and address any reported complaints promptly to ensure the vehicle's safety.

Top stats at a glance

Complaint Count

90

Recall Count

2

Investigation Count

0

Safety Rating

4/5

Search Vehicle Details

Advanced Search

The advanced search lets you search by safety ratings and features. This will return a list of vehicles that match your search criteria.

Safety Features

2013 Nissan Juke SUV AWD Safety Features

Here are the safety features that come as standard on the 2013 Nissan Juke SUV AWD

Electronic Stability Control (ESC)

ESC is an advanced safety feature in vehicles designed to help drivers maintain control during challenging driving conditions. By continuously monitoring various factors such as steering angle, vehicle speed, and individual wheel speeds, ESC can detect and reduce the risk of skidding or loss of control. It achieves this by automatically applying brakes to specific wheels to stabilize the vehicle.

Standard
Forward Collision Warning (FCW)

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) is a safety feature in vehicles that helps prevent frontal collisions by alerting the driver of an imminent collision with a vehicle or obstacle ahead. Using sensors such as radar or cameras, FCW monitors the distance and speed of vehicles in front, and if it detects a potential collision, it provides visual and/or auditory warnings to prompt the driver to take evasive action.

No
Lane Departure Warning (LDW)

Lane Departure Warning (LDW) is a safety feature in vehicles that alerts drivers when their vehicle unintentionally drifts out of its lane without signaling. Utilizing cameras or sensors to monitor lane markings on the road, LDW detects when the vehicle crosses these lines and triggers visual, auditory, or haptic alerts to notify the driver of potential lane departure.

No

2013 Nissan Juke SUV AWD Safety Ratings

Here we have the crash and rollover ratings for the 2013 Nissan Juke SUV AWD Where possible we've included the ratings for the oldest and latest models of this car so you can compare how the safety ratings have changed over time.

Frontal Crash Ratings

Combines Driver and Passenger star ratings into a single frontal rating. The frontal barrier test simulates a head-on collision between two similar vehicles, each moving at 35 mph.

Test 2011 Score 2013 Score 2017 Score
Overall Front Crash Rating Not Rated 3 3
Front Crash Driver Side Rating Not Rated 4 4
Front Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated 3 3

Side Crash Ratings

Combines Side Barrier and Side Pole Star Ratings into a single side rating.

Test 2011 Score 2013 Score 2017 Score
Overall Side Crash Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Side Crash Drivers Side Rating Not Rated 4 Not Rated
Side Crash Passenger Side Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Front Not Rated 4 Not Rated
Combined Side Barrier Pole Rating - Rear Not Rated 5 Not Rated
Overall Side Barrier Rating Not Rated 4 Not Rated

Rollover Ratings

The Rollover Resistance test measures the risk of rollover in a single-vehicle, loss-of-control scenario.

Test 2011 Score 2013 Score 2017 Score
Rollover Rating Not Rated 4 4
Rollover Possibility % 0% 0% 0%
Dynamic Tip Result No Tip No Tip
Side Pole Crash Rating Not Rated 5 Not Rated

Complaints for the 2013 Nissan JUKE

This chart show the number of complaints for each car component. A Higher number of complaints could indicate that this car might have a common fault. Something to look out for when purchasing one.

Component Complaints

Choose a component to see what complaints people have made about them.

Complaint:
"the contact's mother owns a 2013 nissan juke. the contact received notification of manufacturer communication number: ntb14-030 in 2014. the vehicle was taken to the local dealer for the recall repair and the timing chain was replaced. the vehicle was repaired. the contact stated while approaching the parked vehicle, she became aware of an oil leak in the front passenger’s side tire. the contact took the vehicle back to the local dealer, where it was diagnosed with needing the timing chain to be replaced a second time. the vehicle was repaired. the manufacturer had not been informed of the failure. the failure mileage was approximately 125,000."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2023-05-06

Complaint:
"the contact owns a 2013 nissan juke. the contact stated while driving 55 mph and depressing the accelerator pedal, the vehicle failed to accelerate as needed. the contact stated that the service engine warning light was illuminated. the contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic to be diagnosed and the contact was informed that the turbo charger and mass airflow (maf) sensor needed to be replaced. the independent mechanic replaced the mass airflow (maf) sensor but experienced the failure for a second time. the contact took the vehicle back to the independent mechanic and had the mass airflow (maf) sensor replaced for a second time but experienced the failure a third time. the contact took the vehicle to the local dealer and was informed that the vehicle needed to be diagnosed. the contact declined the diagnostic test due to the cost. the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer had not been informed of the failure. the failure mileage was approximately 46,000."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2022-01-01

Complaint:
"while driving, the turbo on the vehicle failed and caused the engine to fail, including sudden loss of an ability to accelerate. smoke began coming from the hood in addition to horrendous sounds. there were no warning lights on my dashboard but i had begun to hear a high pitched, unusual sound. my safety and my passengers, as well as other drivers on the road were at risk due to traveling on a highway and the sudden inability to maintain speed. the dealer has confirmed the problem and multiple auto shops have confirmed this is a known problem with the vehicle year, make, and model. the car is low mileage (just over 63,000) and all have informed me that the mechanical failure is a manufacturing problem and of no fault of my own. the dealership has declined to provide any assistance due to being out of warranty, which is not the question at hand - the question is the manufacturing failure. i do not have anything in writing but could obtain from both nissan of richmond (dealership) and i have a case number with nissan - #48625064."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2023-07-04

Complaint:
"the contact owns a 2013 nissan juke. the contact stated while driving at various speeds, the service engine warning light illuminated. the contact stated that the vehicle lost motive power, decelerated, and failed to properly accelerate while depressing the accelerator pedal. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who diagnosed that the timing cover was faulty and needed to be replaced. the vehicle was not yet repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure, but no assistance was offered. the local dealer was not yet contacted. the failure mileage was 129,000."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2023-07-12

Complaint:
"the contact owns a 2013 nissan juke. the contact stated that while stopped at a sign or while driving at low speeds, the vehicle stalled. the check engine warning light was illuminated. the vehicle was taken to the local dealer and was diagnosed that the timing chain had a hole in the cover. additionally, there was a massive oil leak. the vehicle was repaired however, the failure recurred. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic and the contact was made aware of diagnostic trouble codes: p0300, p0114, and engine misfire. the manufacturer was notified of the failure however, no additional assistance was provided. the approximate failure mileage was 10,581."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2022-04-04

Complaint:
"car has just 45,000 miles on engine. purchased new from pohanka nissan in salisbury md 2013. now has turbo charger failure. lost power suddenly on highway traveling 60 mph. taken to nissan dealer who states that a nut backed off of the fan in the turbo charger causing damage not only to the turbo charger, but to two of the engine cylinders. seems unreasonable that this could occur in the absence of a mechanical error during construction of the car. no prior engine problems. car is essentially totaled as repair will cost more than the car cost new."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2022-03-09

Complaint:
"my 2013 juke sl broke down while i was driving. the car slowed down and then came to a stop and wouldn't start. it was towed to a nissan service dealership. they found that the engine timing chain broke and damaged my engine. i waited weeks to hear back from nissan corporate office. they will do nothing. i bought the car brand new and doesn't have 60,000 miles on it. the nissan dealership will give me 500.00 for trade in. 2011-2013 jukes have had this faulty timing chain. i can't believe nissan won't do anything for me."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2020-11-06

Complaint:
"car has 64000 miles and while it was driven the timing chain broke and bent the valves . i called nissan and there is no recall even there is too many complaints like mine .new engine $5000. where is the quality nissan used to have . with this and cvt transmission issues you need think twice and may be switch to hyundai or kia ,at least they have 100000 miles bumper to bumper warranty."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2021-05-06

Complaint:
"since purchasing my 2013 nissan juke i have continually had problems driving on the hwy, especially when it's hot out, driving my car on major hwy (i-5 interstate), i drive from ca to or about 5 times a year my car will suddenly, no warning light, decelerate from 70 mph to 30 mph almost causing me to get in a accident every single time it happens right now i'm on the side of the road in the middle of nowhere and i'm just hoping that my car is going to start again i barely made it to the off-ramp this is a documented all over the web by hundreds of owners! the 2013 nissan juke this turbocharger or whatever it is with the engine that is making this happen is so serious i could die on the freeway and i don't want to die when nissan should be replacing these it's a known fact and nissan is not acknowledging it if you look at the blogs and other complaints online you will see thousands of people have complained about it too i don't want to die because of this and i can't afford to put in a new turbo charger or a new engine in my car when this is a known issue!! nissan has a legal responsibility to replace these parts for us for their customers and our suffering from this. it is beyond an accident waiting to happen when you were on an interstate freeway in your car goes from 70 miles an hour down to 30 or 40 and will barely go over that you can barely even get off the side of the road without getting run over by major huge trucks it is a total safety problem and it needs to be addressed. there are no warning lights or anything that even shows you what it could possibly be and people who go to nissan and say this happened they always say the same thing well it didn't happen for us while we were driving it so we don't know what it is they know very well exactly what it is. thousands or hundreds of people who are complaining about this are all not lying."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2020-02-02

Complaint:
"tl* the contact owns a 2013 nissan juke. while driving various speeds, an abnormal noise was detected from the vehicle. the higher the rpm, the louder and faster the noise occurred. the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who stated that the timing chain caused the noise. the vehicle was currently waiting to be towed to a dealer for diagnostic testing. the vehicle was not repaired. the dealer was not contacted. the manufacturer was made aware of the failure and provided a case number. the failure mileage was 66,000."
Components Involved: ENGINE
Date of incident: 2019-04-08

Recalls for the 2013 Nissan JUKE

Component Recalls

Choose a component to see what recalls people have made about them.

Recall:
"nissan north america, inc. (nissan) is recalling certain model year 2014 versa sedan vehicles manufactured july 16, 2013, to january 29, 2014, 2013-2014 cube vehicles manufactured july 3, 2013, to october 21, 2013, and 2013-2014 juke vehicles manufactured july 3, 2013, to october 22, 2013. when exposed to hot temperatures, the affected vehicles have an engine start/stop button that may stick inside the button housing."
Consequence:
If the engine start/stop button gets stuck in the housing, road vibrations may cause the engine to shut off unexpectedly while the vehicle is being driven, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy:

Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will modify the start/stop switch housing, free of charge. The recall began on August 4, 2015. Owners may contact Nissan customer service at 1-800-647-7261.

Component(s) Involved: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM > IGNITION > SWITCH
Date of incident: 2015-07-01

NISSAN Overall Complaint Ranking

This table shows the ranking of car manufacturers when it comes to most complaints and recalls. The manufacturer with the most complaints is at the top. However this doesn't necassarily mean they should be avoided. Some manufacturers might just have more popular or affordable cars which a lot of people have bought. Which means there's more scope for a complaint to be made. Use the ranking table below as a part your wider research into buying a car.

NISSAN ranks 5 out of 44 in the complaints ranking table.

Manufacturer Complaint Count Recall Count Ranking
FORD 208,358 3,259 1
CHEVROLET 111,306 2,082 2
TOYOTA 81,019 1,852 3
HONDA 61,937 1,268 4
NISSAN 56,226 930 5
DODGE 45,756 827 6
HYUNDAI 44,150 649 7
GMC 34,441 1,410 8
KIA 29,832 501 9
CHRYSLER 27,698 254 10
TESLA 26,230 730 11
BMW 24,890 1,877 12
VOLKSWAGEN 23,125 829 13
MERCEDES-BENZ 19,066 2,925 14
SUBARU 18,513 703 15
MAZDA 10,599 364 16
PONTIAC 10,430 138 17
CADILLAC 9,434 444 18
AUDI 7,865 1,093 19
BUICK 7,851 279 20
SATURN 7,672 84 21
MERCURY 7,374 135 22
LEXUS 6,373 408 23
LINCOLN 5,897 423 24
ACURA 5,722 382 25
MINI 5,585 366 26
INFINITI 4,000 187 27
MITSUBISHI 3,912 397 28
VOLVO 3,875 727 29
PORSCHE 2,646 1,231 30
SUZUKI 2,272 123 31
FIAT 2,205 80 32
SAAB 1,536 76 33
JAGUAR 1,195 198 34
SMART 528 17 35
GENESIS 436 42 36
ISUZU 249 37 37
ALFA ROMEO 161 37 38
MASERATI 76 46 39
BENTLEY 46 159 40
POLESTAR 42 2 41
LUCID 14 6 42
CODA 4 2 43
MAYBACH 0 0 44

Related Vehicles

Why not check out other NISSAN vehicles?

2005 MAXIMA
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 947
  • Recall Count: 2
View Car
2021 NV1500, NV2500, NV3500
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: Not Rated
  • Complaints Count: 2
  • Recall Count: 0
View Car
2011 ALTIMA HEV
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: 4
  • Complaints Count: 236
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car
2016 JUKE
NISSAN
  • Overall Safety Rating: 4
  • Complaints Count: 24
  • Recall Count: 1
View Car